<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Could The Economic Meltdown Be The Result of Economic Terrorism?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tradingindicators.org/could-the-economic-meltdown-be-the-result-of-economic-terrorism/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tradingindicators.org/could-the-economic-meltdown-be-the-result-of-economic-terrorism</link>
	<description>Stock, Forex and Futures Trading Indicators for Technical Analysis</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 17:05:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: marcus</title>
		<link>http://www.tradingindicators.org/could-the-economic-meltdown-be-the-result-of-economic-terrorism#comment-1539</link>
		<dc:creator>marcus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 17:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradingindicators.org/could-the-economic-meltdown-be-the-result-of-economic-terrorism#comment-1539</guid>
		<description>1.) No, I don&#039;t thik so. The late-day plunges (or surges) are due to computer programs, but they&#039;re buying or selling at points that regular traders / fund managers loaded. It&#039;s just that with the market where it is - everyone and all such programs are on a hair trigger and they&#039;re all firing together.

The root cause of this cluster is obvious. 
We wrote each other too many loans that the borrowers couldn&#039;t pay back, and the loan-writers weren&#039;t going to be carrying those loans - they intended to sell them anyway - and this went on and on.

2.) If there was any &quot;terrorism&quot; is was Barney Frank and Barrack Obama and well-intentioned like politicians REQUIRING banks to disreguard risk because home-ownership is (they would say) a RIGHT even those without money should have.

We are all now buying homes for the entitlement crowd - because the government (us) won&#039;t foreclose on those who never should have gotten those loans in the first place.

That patter lead to the housing bubble and subsequant slump.  Now we&#039;re ALL up-side-down ; owing more than our houses are worth.  Some of us will pay our way out of it. Some of us will walk away from these over-inflated mortgages taken on over-inflated house prices - which causes values to decline more (more vacancies, more foreclosure, less value in the surrounding owner-occupied houses) - and the cycle spirals down.

When house prices stop falling (and pending home sales are UP!  yeah!)  - - then the ambiguous &quot;Mortgaged Backed Securities&quot; that are so difficult to value (and so which are the asset no-one can assess) - will firm up.  And then we can all try to live happily ever after again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1.) No, I don&#8217;t thik so. The late-day plunges (or surges) are due to computer programs, but they&#8217;re buying or selling at points that regular traders / fund managers loaded. It&#8217;s just that with the market where it is &#8211; everyone and all such programs are on a hair trigger and they&#8217;re all firing together.</p>
<p>The root cause of this cluster is obvious.<br />
We wrote each other too many loans that the borrowers couldn&#8217;t pay back, and the loan-writers weren&#8217;t going to be carrying those loans &#8211; they intended to sell them anyway &#8211; and this went on and on.</p>
<p>2.) If there was any &quot;terrorism&quot; is was Barney Frank and Barrack Obama and well-intentioned like politicians REQUIRING banks to disreguard risk because home-ownership is (they would say) a RIGHT even those without money should have.</p>
<p>We are all now buying homes for the entitlement crowd &#8211; because the government (us) won&#8217;t foreclose on those who never should have gotten those loans in the first place.</p>
<p>That patter lead to the housing bubble and subsequant slump.  Now we&#8217;re ALL up-side-down ; owing more than our houses are worth.  Some of us will pay our way out of it. Some of us will walk away from these over-inflated mortgages taken on over-inflated house prices &#8211; which causes values to decline more (more vacancies, more foreclosure, less value in the surrounding owner-occupied houses) &#8211; and the cycle spirals down.</p>
<p>When house prices stop falling (and pending home sales are UP!  yeah!)  &#8211; - then the ambiguous &quot;Mortgaged Backed Securities&quot; that are so difficult to value (and so which are the asset no-one can assess) &#8211; will firm up.  And then we can all try to live happily ever after again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Confused ...</title>
		<link>http://www.tradingindicators.org/could-the-economic-meltdown-be-the-result-of-economic-terrorism#comment-1543</link>
		<dc:creator>Confused ...</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 17:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradingindicators.org/could-the-economic-meltdown-be-the-result-of-economic-terrorism#comment-1543</guid>
		<description>You have very good imagination and should consider to write a book on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You have very good imagination and should consider to write a book on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LBJ</title>
		<link>http://www.tradingindicators.org/could-the-economic-meltdown-be-the-result-of-economic-terrorism#comment-1542</link>
		<dc:creator>LBJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 17:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradingindicators.org/could-the-economic-meltdown-be-the-result-of-economic-terrorism#comment-1542</guid>
		<description>why does Debt of Honour come to mind? Anyway what I point out is the the markets never close, not completly, trading still goes on. Take PRC they buy and sell in dollars the Yuan isn&#039;t exactly a proper currency. I tend to think its more Govt positioning over currencies which is in part to blame, might be wrong but that&#039;s my two penny worth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why does Debt of Honour come to mind? Anyway what I point out is the the markets never close, not completly, trading still goes on. Take PRC they buy and sell in dollars the Yuan isn&#8217;t exactly a proper currency. I tend to think its more Govt positioning over currencies which is in part to blame, might be wrong but that&#8217;s my two penny worth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spell Check !!</title>
		<link>http://www.tradingindicators.org/could-the-economic-meltdown-be-the-result-of-economic-terrorism#comment-1540</link>
		<dc:creator>Spell Check !!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 17:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradingindicators.org/could-the-economic-meltdown-be-the-result-of-economic-terrorism#comment-1540</guid>
		<description>I agree with you 100% Tom Clancy is my hero I read his books day after day..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you 100% Tom Clancy is my hero I read his books day after day..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dapper Napper</title>
		<link>http://www.tradingindicators.org/could-the-economic-meltdown-be-the-result-of-economic-terrorism#comment-1541</link>
		<dc:creator>Dapper Napper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 17:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tradingindicators.org/could-the-economic-meltdown-be-the-result-of-economic-terrorism#comment-1541</guid>
		<description>I agree with marcus on this one. There was a comment on one of the Cable News Networks about this that went something like this - Reagan and Bush Sr. Set the logs, Clinton put them alight, and Bush Jr. has been pouring gasoline on them. Congress has been busy bringing kindling and building a better blowtorch the whole time.

I&#039;d say the smartest thing to do at this point is to think very carefully about who you really want to elect as leader of the country. I&#039;m not saying one candidate is better than the other - I view it as the lesser of two evils, until Nader and Barr got into the ring that is. May still be so, not sure.

One thing is certain - what has been going on is damn close to sedition or treason, I&#039;m having a hard time figuring out which!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with marcus on this one. There was a comment on one of the Cable News Networks about this that went something like this &#8211; Reagan and Bush Sr. Set the logs, Clinton put them alight, and Bush Jr. has been pouring gasoline on them. Congress has been busy bringing kindling and building a better blowtorch the whole time.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say the smartest thing to do at this point is to think very carefully about who you really want to elect as leader of the country. I&#8217;m not saying one candidate is better than the other &#8211; I view it as the lesser of two evils, until Nader and Barr got into the ring that is. May still be so, not sure.</p>
<p>One thing is certain &#8211; what has been going on is damn close to sedition or treason, I&#8217;m having a hard time figuring out which!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

